Rog's world online

Archive

You are currently viewing older posts from the archive of NecroRogIcon: 1999-2009.

For current posts visit NecroRogIcon.

Or browse the archive by month:
from 1999-2009

Thu
26
May '05

Time's top 100 Movies list

Rog posted in

Time has released their opinion of the top 100 Movies of all time. Wisely, they have put the movies in no particular order. The list, in my opinion, is peppered with some nostalgia choices that don't seem to make much sense in the light of notable exceptions. For instance, I would certainly have included Young Frankenstein rather than the Bride of Frankenstein (which seems like just a nod to Boris Karloff).

I can pick out 17 films from their list that I whole-heartedly agree with. I love these:

Blade Runner
Brazil
Chinatown
Citizen Kane
Dr. Strangelove: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
Drunken Master II (I'm astonished but pleased that Jackie Chan's masterpiece made the list)
Finding Nemo
The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
It's a Wonderful Life
Lawrence of Arabia
The Lord of the Rings
Once Upon a Time in the West
Pulp Fiction
Schindler's List
Star Wars
Taxi Driver
Unforgiven

I can think of 26 great movies that would have been fully deserving of the top 100 but were snubbed. The more I think about it, the more this list grows:

2001: A Space Odyssey
The African Queen
Dog Day Afternoon
Donnie Darko
The Fifth Element
Fight Club
Fistful of Dollars
For a Few Dollars More
Glengarry Glen Ross
Gone With The Wind
Highlander
The Killer
The Man Who Would Be King
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
The Nightmare Before Christmas
The Odd Couple
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
The Princess Bride
Rear Window
Scarface
Se7en
Shrek
The Silence of the Lambs
Spartacus
The Wizard of Oz
Young Frankenstein

Yes, I realize I'd add an additional 2 Sergio Leone films for a total of 4, but genius is genius.

I also can't resist listing a few of my favourite films that would never see lists such as these:

The Balcony
Better off Dead
Flesh & Blood
The Hitcher
The Hudsucker Proxy
Moulin Rouge
Muppets From Space
The Planet of the Apes
Ravenous
Robin and the 7 Hoods
Secretary
Toys
Zardoz

(4:18 am)

Wed
11
May '05

It's summer, there are wasps.

Rog posted in

How is it that wasps can always find the smallest crack to get in, but no matter how wide you open the window, they can't seem to find their way out?

(3:31 pm)

Tue
10
May '05

The WoW woes.

Rog posted in

Is it just me, or has server stability for World of Warcraft gotten even worse than it was (and it was pretty bad to begin with). Maybe I've been spoiled lately with other MMORPGs, but I honestly thought I had an easy-going attitude to server stability with games. I understand that it's a huge thing and huge things tend to have growth pains, but sometimes I think it's just absurd.

It doesn't help that this happened while I was rolling for the first epic loot from a boss in my very first raid instance run. Talk about bad timing and a bad impression. It's the second time this week that multiple servers have been completely borked for hours on end.

I love the game, but I'm starting to agree with Penny Arcade's take on the whole stability issue back in January: they revoked World of Warcraft's "Game of the Year" title. I'm seriously wondering if Blizzard is pulling an EA here and is abusing a situation of popularity, not putting enough resources into stability while collecting millions in subscriptions. I don't want my hours refunded, I want the thing to be up. I may not be a fan of Everquest as a game, but Blizzard could learn a lot in the way of customer service from them. I think they've been spoiled by the fanboys of their previous games.

I'll keep playing, for the same reason others do: because I enjoy the game, I've invested my time in it so far and on gameplay I think the competition sucks. But if I keep playing after too many situations like this, I'll be the one feeling like a sucker.

(2:34 am)

Fri
6
May '05

On Body Mods, in response to Sue

Rog posted in

I didn't notice until two days later, but Sue has made some interesting observations about her own personal approach to body mods. I replied in her comments, but I've been wanting to say something here on this topic for awhile, so I'm going to quote myself and then perhaps followup with more of my thoughts in a few days:

. . .
For me, choosing how/when/where I wish to modify my body is part of my own personal proof that *I* am in charge of my body and no one else is. You mention stretch marks and wrinkles and I assume scars would fit into the same category: I’m highly fascinated with intentional scarfication, the ability to map them out on your own body by choice. Any body mod is a way of understanding that my body is my possession. In fact, it’s taking possession. Maybe that should seem really obvious to most people, but for myself it has been a relatively discovery.

Thus, I have newfound wonder at people who think that ear piercings are fine, but any sort of plastic surgery is vanity and therefore crude or a sign of disastisfaction. Sure, it could be, but I’m convinced that there are a good number of people who choose to change their bodies simply because they can. And they have no hangups about it, but a whole lot of other people seem to.

I think that’s a major issue, that people critical of body modification are often mirroring their own insecurities and making assumptions as to why someone might change something. The typical phrase of “if they aren’t happy with themselves now, plastic surgery won’t help that” assumes sooooo much and from my perspective it just completely misses the point. I’d venture to say that a good number of people who make changes to their body are more aware of it and more comfortable with themselves than the people whom make such comments.
. . .

(8:03 am)

Thu
5
May '05

Television falls behind.

Rog posted in

I have to admit, I've never been big on watching Television. As a kid, I wandered quickly away from the tube, getting very bored of what my parents considered safe-for-children TV, which generally meant afternoon sitcoms (although there were some notable exceptions and I grudgingly admit to recognizing nearly every episode of Three's Company). As an adult, I'm not much different, I have little tolerance for throw-away entertainment. I like my story-telling to feel as if it's going somewhere, which means I prefer a serial that progresses rather than melodramatic soaps or one-shot episodes that can be watched in any order. The story doesn't have to be linear, but characters should grow and conclusions are nice.

Television caters to the short-attention span people. Television wants impulsive shoppers and hands-on-the-remote zombies.

Sure, that sounds like a cliché, but I don't feel that most people fit into that boob tube fixated crowd. Maybe they did once, but they've moved on. New mediums have been invented and old ones made anew. They can't keep pushing television like a drug, they can't just assume that millions of people are automatically glued to their sets, they can't spoon feed their lazy-assed content forever. If Television doesn't shape up, it will just die. Not with a bang, but it will slowly blend into other mediums. People are already making their own choices about what to watch and when to watch it. "Primetime" is fading while we plug in our Tivos, buy DVDs or download content to our PCs. Some sitcoms are not even ending up on TV at all.

The technology has surpassed the unreliable VCR and we're using it. The media companies complain that we can conveniently make near-perfect copies and it's ruining their business, but they're wrong: it's ruining the way they do business. They have to change to keep up with the times. We still want visual entertainment, but now we're challenging them to give it to us on our schedules. And it can no longer suck.

So where did this rant come from? I do watch occasional TV shows that I find interesting: Oz and the first season of 24 are good examples. This year, it's Lost. I was enjoying the first batch of episodes, but then I noticed it started to fall into an episodic pattern, much to my disdain, then the reruns hit and my frustration at the nature of Television jumped right up front and center. I realized that I'm a valid member of their audience and they can't pull me too and fro based on their perception of the necessity of "sweeps week", etc.. From this point on, I'll be prepared to purchase Lost on DVD and in the absence of that availability, I will download it. I refuse to slave my entertainments to an antiquated medium.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm headed out to buy the first season DVD set of The Bob Newhart Show.

(4:59 pm)